v icke-medicinska skäl, är problema

v icke-medicinska skäl, är problematiskt i de fall då föräldrar väljer att inte vaccinera sina barn mot farliga barnsjukdomar (t.ex. på grund av villfarelsen att sjukdomen är ”nyttig” för barnet att gå igenom), eller då man sprider felaktiga påståenden som överdriver riskerna med vaccin. Efter de ökade inrapporteringarna av narkolepsi hos barn som fått vaccin mot svininfluensan, fick vaccinmotståndet ett uppsving i Sverige.
Med hjälp av vaccinationsprogrammen har samhället lyckats tygla eller i vissa fall helt utrota sjukdomar som tidigare dödat både barn och vuxna. Men i takt med att allt färre sett sjukdomarnas verkningar på nära håll minskar också förståelsen för hur allvarliga de är. Då växer också osäkerheten kring vilka åtgärder vi är beredda att stå ut med för att hålla sjukdomarna borta. Alla mediciner innebär risk för biverkningar, och tror man inte att vaccinationen behövs kan det vara svårt att acceptera den risken.

Resultat (engelska) 1:

v non-medical reasons, is problematic in cases where the parents choose not to vaccinate their children against dangerous childhood diseases (e.g. because of the delusion that the disease is "useful" for the child to go through), or when it spreads false claims that exaggerate the risks associated with the vaccine. After the increased inrapporteringarna of narcolepsy in children who received the vaccine against swine flu, vaccine resistance a boost in Sweden.With the help of vaccination programmes, society has managed to curb or in some cases completely eradicate diseases that previously killed both children and adults. However, as fewer and fewer seen disease effects up close also reduces our understanding of how serious they are. Then is also growing uncertainty about what actions we are prepared to put up with to keep diseases away. All medications involves a risk of side effects, and not to think that vaccination is needed, it can be difficult to accept that risk.

Resultat (engelska) 2:

v non-medical reasons, is problematic in cases where parents choose not to vaccinate their children against dangerous childhood diseases (eg due to the delusion that the disease is "useful" for the baby to go through), or when spreading false claims that exaggerate the risks of the vaccine. After the increased reporting are of narcolepsy in children who received the vaccine against swine flu, the vaccine resistance a boost in Sweden.
With the help of vaccination programs, society has managed to curb or in some cases completely eradicate diseases that previously killed both children and adults. But as fewer and fewer diseases seen effects at close range also reduces the understanding of how serious they are. Then also growing uncertainty about what measures we are prepared to put up with to keep diseases away. All medicines presents a risk of side effects, and it is not believed that vaccination is needed, it can be difficult to accept that risk.

Resultat (engelska) 3:

v non medical reasons, is problematic in cases where parents choose not to vaccinate their children against dangerous childhood diseases (e.g., due to the fallacy that the disease is "useful" for the child to go through), or where the spreading false statements, exaggerating the risks associated with the vaccine. after the increased inrapporteringarna of narcolepsy in children who received the vaccine against swine flu, vaccinmotståndet got a boost in sweden.with the help of vaccination programmes, society has reined in, or in some cases completely eradicate diseases which previously killed both children and adults. but in pace with fewer seen s effects on close also reduces the understanding of how serious they are. it is also growing uncertainty as to what measures we are prepared to put up with to keep diseases away. all the medicines, the risk of adverse effects, and you do not believe that vaccination is needed, it may be difficult to accept the risk.